For the latest readers arriving to this blog, I periodically have short descriptions of upcoming material under the “Watch this space” title. Up next, as a combined result of seeing articles about the Supreme Court taking up the discussion of whether Honolulu v Sunoco belongs in state or Federal court, and the quite recent article implying Naomi Oreskes is trying to figure out how to influence Chief Justice John Roberts’ clerks, I thought it would be wise to compile a summary of Oreskes’ massive narrative inconsistencies, somewhat similar to the summary format I did concerning William Connolley’s apparent involvement in efforts to impugn the credibility of skeptic climate scientists. There is a common thread here – the “ExxonKnew” lawsuits / Connolley / Oreskes: they all are enslaved to literally the same worthless ‘leaked industry memos evidence’ in their accusations about the fossil fuel industry employing skeptic climate scientist ‘shills’ to deceive the public about the ‘harm’ of global warming. If Oreskes is exposed as the tip of the iceberg about that false accusation, the collective “ExxonKnew” lawsuits effort and the overall smear of skeptic climate scientists is at risk of total collapse — the public learning that we instead have every appearance of a core clique of enviro-activists deceiving the public about the credibility of skeptic climate scientists. But people with the power and influence at the SCOTUS level must first be aware of where all of Oreskes’ faulty narratives are.

Meanwhile, please do scroll down this page for my completed posts, and return soon to see how the next one coming up will fill in this space.