{"id":6630,"date":"2018-04-06T16:10:50","date_gmt":"2018-04-06T23:10:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/?p=6630"},"modified":"2018-11-27T16:14:03","modified_gmt":"2018-11-27T23:14:03","slug":"freebeacon-calif-cities-suing-exxon-forced-to-walk-back-key-claim","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/?p=6630","title":{"rendered":"FreeBeacon: “Calif. Cities Suing Exxon Forced to Walk Back Key Claim”"},"content":{"rendered":"

From Todd Shepherd’s April 5, 2018 Washington Free Beacon<\/em> article<\/a>:<\/p>\n

California cities suing Exxon and four other oil companies have reworded a portion<\/a> of their original complaint after being rebuked by the presiding judge. \u2026<\/p>\n

\u2026 The cities had initially pointed to a 1996 internal memo from an industry group, the Global Climate Coalition (funded by the America Petroleum Institute), which said that, “a doubling of carbon dioxide levels over pre-industrial concentrations would occur by 2100 and cause \u2018an average rate of warming [that] would probably be greater than any seen in the past 10,000 years.'”<\/p>\n

\u2026 However, the memo was referencing an assessment by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and was not the independent findings of the GCC’s work.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The Free Beacon shows the backpedal rewording in their own photo link above, and I reproduce it here for good measure (click image to enlarge):<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

That specific paragraph section’s wording in its original form<\/em><\/strong> is what prompted the title of my prior March 30, 2018 blog post, “If California v. BP<\/em> Implodes via Insufficient Evidence, so can New York City v. BP<\/em>.<\/a>” Read all the way through my blog post, and you’ll see how this ‘lack of evidence to prove a fossil fuel industry conspiracy’ problem with the twin California global warming lawsuits\u00a0and the NYC one<\/a> doesn’t end there, it ultimately points a giant red flashing arrow at the clique of people who have tried for 20+ years to say there is ‘a fossil fuel industry misinformation conspiracy to reposition global warming as theory rather than fact.’<\/p>\n

The California lawsuits’ reworded paragraph section loses all its teeth as “smoking gun” evidence proving oil companies knew man-caused global warming was settled science. It shouldn’t be reworded, it should be stripped entirely out of the lawsuits, and the main lawyer behind the use of it in both the California<\/a> and New York<\/a> lawsuits – Matt Pawa – should be compelled to explain why he didn’t know the evidence was totally worthless<\/em><\/strong> \u2026.. or whether he knew it was worthless the entire time. But as I showed in my prior blog post, that same paragraph section<\/a> appears in Matt Pawa’s 2008 Kivalina v. Exxon<\/em> lawsuit<\/a>, as does the supposedly leaked memo subset insinuating skeptic climate scientist shills were paid and instructed under an industry strategy directive<\/a> to “reposition global warming” which targeted “older, less-educated males” and “younger, lower-income women.”<\/p>\n

No such targets or strategy<\/a> was ever used by anybody anywhere.<\/p>\n

The effort to prove the fossil fuel industry conspired to misinform the public about the certainty of man-caused global warming is demonstrably beginning to fall apart. The focus on where the real conspiracy is to be found should be turned 180 degrees in the opposite direction, to a particular small group people who’ve apparently conspired for years to misinform the public about the certainty of corporate-corrupted skeptic climate scientists.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

From Todd Shepherd’s April 5, 2018 Washington Free Beacon article: California cities suing Exxon and four other oil companies have reworded a portion of their original complaint after being rebuked by the presiding judge. \u2026 \u2026 The cities had initially … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[61,135,112],"tags":[145,92],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6630"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6630"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6630\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6640,"href":"https:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6630\/revisions\/6640"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6630"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6630"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6630"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}