Maybe that kind of reasoning is meets with little opposition in the unreal world of news media \/ social media, but in the very real world of litigation (if the 20+ “Exxon Knew”-style global warming lawsuits<\/a> resolve legal technicalities of whether they fall under Federal or state court jurisdiction), the law firms hired by energy company defendants will start questioning the often-repeated accusation from Al Gore that their clients colluded with skeptic climate scientists in disinformation campaigns designed to undercut the certainty of man-caused global warming. Perhaps enviro-activists may try to spin that as “Big Oil’s defense lawyers push right-wing conspiracy theories<\/em>” for the biased news media to repeat, but that intimidation tactic to shut down questioning is not likely to work out well at all within the confines of any courtroom.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Imagine what happens if Gore is ever subpoenaed, but if he dodges that bullet, the contradictory things surrounding his role in the “Exxon Knew” accusation might still have to be explained:<\/p>\n Well, which is it, an effort created by Exxon, or one created in the coal industry?<\/p>\n Who had the memos first, then?<\/p>\n Which was it? An informal tally done on a whim, or a serious research effort done at a major academic level, undertaken by a team of accredited researchers. Did Al Gore commit a ‘Roger Stone-like’ crime<\/a> of making a false statement to Congress<\/a>, or was Naomi Oreskes vastly understating what it took to carry out her study?<\/p>\n Just askin’. So far, ordinary citizens can get away with the response “just asking” when chastised for questioning the inconsistencies in narratives about man-caused global warming, but maybe not much longer if that starts falling into what ‘Big Tech’ vilifies as spreading … Continue reading \n
\n
\n
![](\"http:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/Gore-U-of-C-928-consensus.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
\n————————————————————————
\nPart 2<\/a>: Al Gore said what he said there about “The team<\/strong> was led by Professor Naomi Oreskes<\/em>” for a specific reason.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"