My prior blog post pointed out the irreconcilable difference between reports that Greenpeace administrator Kert Davies or Greenpeace worker Jesse Coleman was the person who initiated Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests which supposedly exposed the corporate corruption of skeptic climate scientist Dr Willie Soon. Coleman or Davies – can’t be both. While I was compiling my prior blog post, I spotted another sizable problem, but I noted that it would have to be a Part 2 separate blog post. So, here it is; the mountainous pile of items showing just how faulty the “crooked skeptic scientists” accusation just keeps getting bigger and more unsustainable to defend. Continue reading
Tag Archives: Jesse Coleman
The ‘Dr Willie Soon got $1.2 million from Exxon’ Accusation … just got an increment more dicey
If you are going to mold a corruption allegation against a particular critic of ‘man-caused global warming’ into one of the central arguments for suing fossil fuel companies out of existence – ‘FOIA-released documents led to the revelation of this industry-paid corruption’ – wouldn’t it be advisable for you to be absolutely certain that the narratives about this ‘FOIA revelation’ line up right, and that there isn’t some other related angle that could land one of your associates in Federal prison over what appears to be his own potentially corrupt behavior? Whereupon – perhaps in exchange to reduce his prison sentence – he might offer prosecutors details on how the corruption allegation (which you have every appearance of concocting out of thin air) may end up imperiling the entire ‘climate crisis’ issue while also landing you in jail or facing monumental civil action penalties? Continue reading
“Long Established Evidence Proving Skeptic Climate Scientists’ Guilt, Baked Fresh Today!”
For all practical purposes, the collective Greenpeace organization committed outright political suicide two weeks ago, essentially telegraphing to the entire world that they never had the evidence they claimed they had, proving skeptic climate scientists lie to the public under a pay-for-performance arrangement with fossil fuel industry people just like the way shill experts lied for the tobacco industry. Their December 8 ambush blunder of skeptic climate scientist Dr Will Happer at Ted Cruz’s Senate hearing is best illustrated with a famous movie courtroom scene question, but let me set the stage with the following points: Continue reading