{"id":4338,"date":"2016-09-16T12:51:23","date_gmt":"2016-09-16T19:51:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/?p=4338"},"modified":"2022-05-01T18:06:59","modified_gmt":"2022-05-02T01:06:59","slug":"to-be-an-objective-reporter-or-not-to-be-that-is-the-question","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/?p=4338","title":{"rendered":"To Be an Objective Reporter, or Not to Be, that is The Question"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>If the reporter in this situation thinks he&#8217;s about to break some kind of major story about &#8216;industry-corrupted skeptic climate scientiss,&#8217; he&#8217;s in for a big disappointment.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>To borrow a line seen from time to time <a href=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/2016\/09\/14\/more-data-showing-that-exxonknew-is-a-dead-campaign\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">at the top of Anthony Watts&#8217; WUWT blogs<\/a>, &#8220;people send me stuff.&#8221; In this case, I was alerted to a reporter&#8217;s plan to document oil industry funding of contrarian scientists who deny climate change is caused by the oil industry, or who more simplistically say the climate is unfluctuating. Yes, I&#8217;m being facetious in that description, but not by much. In fact, if the alert I saw contained one more specific talking point element, it would have read exactly like the pattern I detailed back in <a href=\"http:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/?p=1323\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">my January 30, 2014 blog post<\/a>. Having seen enough of this kind of material over the years, I could pretty much write it myself for these reporters. The only surprise here was who the reporter was and who he worked for: Bruce Livesey, at The Real News Network. Never heard of either before.<\/p>\n<p>So, plop both into an internet search and among the first results that comes up is the <a href=\"http:\/\/therealnews.com\/t2\/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=31&amp;Itemid=74&amp;jumival=16925\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">announcement \/ donation plea<\/a> regarding &#8220;<em>Investigative journalist Bruce Livesey has teamed up with TRNN to make a documentary to expose the Koch brothers&#8217; war on the environment<\/em>\u2026&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Who do we see talking as an authority speaker in the subsequent brief transcript sample for this proposed documentary presentation? <a href=\"http:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/TRNN-Davies.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Kert Davies<\/a>. Yes, <a href=\"http:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/?p=2600\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>that<\/em> Kert Davies<\/a>. Not helping Livesey in the least is Davies&#8217; second assertion about an unnamed &#8220;<em>very underqualified candidate<\/em>&#8221; who won the GOP&#8217;s June 2010 South Carolina 4th congressional district primary race. As I briefly described <a href=\"http:\/\/www.americanthinker.com\/articles\/2015\/05\/emmerchants_of_doubtem_a_climate_change_dud.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a>, this same &#8216;unnamed candidate&#8217; stunt backfired for Naomi Oreskes in her 2015 &#8220;Merchants of Doubt&#8221; movie. Why must this candidate remain unnamed twice now? Because it was <a href=\"http:\/\/www.goupstate.com\/news\/20100623\/gowdy-landslide-solicitor-overwhelms-incumbent\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Trey Gowdy<\/a>, a person who is arguably as qualified as current F.B.I. director (formerly the U.S. Deputy Attorney General) James Comey on prosecutorial matters, as seen starting at the 1:50 point in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=Q3FkvclWWpU&amp;t=106\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">this video<\/a>. For comparison, the &#8216;conservative congressman&#8217; that Livesey and Davies were speaking about was Bob Inglis, who, during his final House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology hearing (at the 2:11:47 point <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=Ka0MmPPT8sk&amp;t=7907\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a>), brought out the remains of an egg in a jar of vinegar in order to bring attention to the problem of ocean acidification. This, in the face of <a href=\"http:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/EPA-Oceans-pH8.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the EPA<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/NOAA-Oceans-pH8.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">NOAA having official information<\/a> placing the world&#8217;s oceans&#8217; overall pH level not on the acid side of the scale where vinegar is, but on the alkaline side.<\/p>\n<p>See the growing problem here? TRNN claims it bases &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/TRNN-mission.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>our journalism on verifiable evidence<\/em><\/a>.&#8221; As demonstrated above, material from Kert Davies about Bob Inglis already on their website implodes under verifiable evidence. And TRNN&#8217;s appearance of accepting the idea of settled man-caused global warming is unavoidable from <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=site%3Atherealnews.com+%22climate+change%22\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">their collection of reports<\/a>. But then there&#8217;s Davies &#8216;true specialty&#8217;, the accusation that skeptic climate scientists were corrupted by industry money. Which, as it turns out, is something that Bruce Livesey has already pointed out on at least <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/search?q=%22bruce+livesey%22+%22kert+davies%22\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">three prior occasions<\/a>, each time citing Kert Davies.<\/p>\n<p>To say that a report about industry manipulation of climate science viewpoints which cites Kert Davies is &#8220;not news&#8221; is actually false, but in a comically roundabout way. At this point in time, the &#8220;news&#8221; stories citing Davies&#8217; accusations have been done so many times, you&#8217;d actually have difficulty <a href=\"http:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/SciAm-Davies.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">counting up his accusations<\/a> (full text for that screencapture wipeout <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/article\/political-football-over-climate-change-rattles-windows-of-ivory-tower\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">here<\/a>) about the Koch brothers, &#8216;dark money&#8217;, Exxon, or whatever other &#8220;enemy du jour&#8221; which happened to be popular at the time who supposedly funded lies from skeptic scientists. Beating a dead horse, as the old saying goes. But there is a consistent theme to all of them:\u00a0 Davies is cited just for the accusation that illicit funding has gone to skeptic climate scientists and organizations skeptical of catastrophic human-induced global warming; when will he finally provide actual evidence proving the funding was done under arrangements where all parties agreed on what, when, where, and how the lies would be spread??<\/p>\n<p>The two questions that objective unbiased investigative reporters need to ask themselves are:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>why is that evidence missing from all reports over the years citing Davies?<\/li>\n<li>what is the reason behind reporters like Bruce Livesey having the appearance of being just a mouthpiece for Davies&#8217; material?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>There&#8217;s no Pulitzer Prize or any other similar journalism award to be won from regurgitating a worn-out 20 year-old+ unsupportable accusation about crooked skeptic climate scientists, otherwise it would have already been awarded at least a decade or more ago. But such an award could be earned by objective unbiased investigative reporters for turning the tables on enviro-activists who fed that accusation to media people who never questioned it. Elemental questions will lead such unbiased reporters to answers which either affirm what&#8217;s come out of the &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/?p=3227\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Greenpeace USA n\u00e9e Ozone Action<\/a>&#8221; side of the global warming issue where Kert Davies is a key figure, or to a massive alternative story which has never been reported in any major way.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>If the reporter in this situation thinks he&#8217;s about to break some kind of major story about &#8216;industry-corrupted skeptic climate scientiss,&#8217; he&#8217;s in for a big disappointment.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[38],"tags":[46,172],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4338"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4338"}],"version-history":[{"count":20,"href":"http:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4338\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13643,"href":"http:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4338\/revisions\/13643"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4338"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4338"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/gelbspanfiles.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4338"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}